Re: [Xen-devel] Xen, MCFG acpi table and E820 address map

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.09.13 at 18:26, Santosh Jodh <Santosh.Jodh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:gordan@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 9:24 AM
> To: Santosh Jodh
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Jan Beulich; xen-devel; Boris Ostrovsky; David 
> Vrabel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen, MCFG acpi table and E820 address map
> 
>  On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 16:14:55 +0000, Santosh Jodh  <Santosh.Jodh@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:01 AM
>> To: Jan Beulich
>> Cc: Santosh Jodh; David Vrabel; xen-devel; Boris Ostrovsky
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen, MCFG acpi table and E820 address map
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:16:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> >>> On 04.09.13 at 03:13, Santosh Jodh <Santosh.Jodh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Xen will use information from MCFG acpi table to access PCIe 
>>> > extended configuration space. However, Xen validates MCFG table by 
>>> > making sure that the addresses specified in the MCFG table is 
>>> > correctly marked as reserved in the E820 address map. If it is
>>> not,
>>> > the MCFG table is ignored - thereby preventing Xen from accessing
>>> PCIe extended configuration space.
>>> >
>>> > I recently came across a workstation class system that supports 
>>> > VT-d. This system BIOS has a valid MCFG table. The BIOS does NOT 
>>> > report the MCFG addresses as reserved in the E820 address map.
>>> > However, the addresses ARE claimed as reserved via the ACPI 
>>> > motherboard resource devnode (PNP0C01) mechanism.
>>
>> Could you tell me what machine this is? It would be good to know to 
>> develop a patch against it.
>> [Santosh Jodh] Unfortunately, this is a new platform I cannot disclose 
>> much about.
> 
>  If this is pre-release/experimental hardware, isn't the  right thing to do 
> to talk to the manufacturer and get them  to fix the BIOS so it exposes the 
> correct e820 map in the  first place?
> [Santosh Jodh] yes - BIOS fix is in progress. My original query was - is 
> this an exception? If it is a trend, then Xen should handle this better.

You seem to ignore my earlier response: Xen _does_ handle this. It's
the pv-ops kernel that doesn't make use of the interface the hypervisor
provides.

And a remark to your mail response style - please try to set up your
mail client such that it properly quotes the original text. The way you
did your responses on this thread so far makes it pretty hard to spot
your additions without first re-reading most of what was already said.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel