Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.05.13 at 10:33, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 07:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 07.05.13 at 18:43, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable 
> FAIL"):
>> >> Ian, I see you also tagged the Xen tree, but unfortunately without
>> >> updating the hypervisor revision to -rc1? Was that intentional? It's
>> >> not a dramatic problem (and I don't see a need to withdraw and
>> >> redo the tag), but maybe worth an addition to the checklist.
>> > 
>> > You mean XEN_EXTRAVERSION in xen/Makefile ?  I wasn't sure
>> > whether that ought to be changed.  It's on the checklist but I don't
>> > know what the usual practice is for an RC.
>> 
>> Keir updated that in the past for the RCs, but personally I don't
>> mind it remaining "-unstable" until the branching occurs.
> 
> It would have been useful so that dmesg logs for people building from
> the tarball will contain the right version. People building from git/hg
> are less of a concern assuming the latest cset thing still works.

Which, as we know from a patch posted by Marek Marczykowski
that never got applied, currently only works for hg, but not git.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel