Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 07:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.05.13 at 18:43, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable 
> > FAIL"):
> >> Ian, I see you also tagged the Xen tree, but unfortunately without
> >> updating the hypervisor revision to -rc1? Was that intentional? It's
> >> not a dramatic problem (and I don't see a need to withdraw and
> >> redo the tag), but maybe worth an addition to the checklist.
> > 
> > You mean XEN_EXTRAVERSION in xen/Makefile ?  I wasn't sure
> > whether that ought to be changed.  It's on the checklist but I don't
> > know what the usual practice is for an RC.
> 
> Keir updated that in the past for the RCs, but personally I don't
> mind it remaining "-unstable" until the branching occurs.

It would have been useful so that dmesg logs for people building from
the tarball will contain the right version. People building from git/hg
are less of a concern assuming the latest cset thing still works.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel