Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/05/13 07:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 07.05.13 at 18:43, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable 
> > FAIL"):
> > > Ian, I see you also tagged the Xen tree, but unfortunately without
> > > updating the hypervisor revision to -rc1? Was that intentional? It's
> > > not a dramatic problem (and I don't see a need to withdraw and
> > > redo the tag), but maybe worth an addition to the checklist.
> > You mean XEN_EXTRAVERSION in xen/Makefile ?  I wasn't sure
> > whether that ought to be changed.  It's on the checklist but I don't
> > know what the usual practice is for an RC.
> Keir updated that in the past for the RCs, but personally I don't
> mind it remaining "-unstable" until the branching occurs.
I think it would be better to update the EXTRAVERSION, but it's not a 
terribly big deal I don't think.
 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel