Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/18 V2]: PVH xen: create domctl_memory_mapping() function

[Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:04:33 +0000
Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 17:26 -0700 on 15 Mar (1363368383), Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > In this patch, XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping code is put into a
> > function so it can be shared later for PVH. There is no change in
> > it's functionality.
> > 
>limit is an unsigned long, so 'int' doesn't seem right. 
> 
> > @@ -628,68 +690,13 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
> >          unsigned long mfn = domctl->u.memory_mapping.first_mfn;
> >          unsigned long nr_mfns = domctl->u.memory_mapping.nr_mfns;
> >          int add = domctl->u.memory_mapping.add_mapping;
> > -        unsigned long i;
> > -
> > -        ret = -EINVAL;
> > -        if ( (mfn + nr_mfns - 1) < mfn || /* wrap? */
> > -             ((mfn | (mfn + nr_mfns - 1)) >> (paddr_bits -
> > PAGE_SHIFT)) ||
> > -             (gfn + nr_mfns - 1) < gfn ) /* wrap? */
> > -            break;
> >  
> >          ret = -EPERM;
> >          if ( !IS_PRIV(current->domain) &&
> >               !iomem_access_permitted(current->domain, mfn, mfn +
> > nr_mfns - 1) ) break;
> 
> Why is this privilege check not being moved along with the rest of it?
> Execially given that the two other IS_PRIV()s below are taken?

Because, the other caller is construct_dom0, so not really needed. But
I'll move it anyways.

thanks,
Mukesh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel