Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/nestedhvm: properly clean up after failure to set up all vCPU-s

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 23.01.13 at 17:46, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23/01/2013 15:57, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>>> On 23.01.13 at 16:17, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2013 14:24, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This implies that the individual destroy functions will have to remain
>>>> capable of being called for a vCPU that the corresponding init function
>>>> was never run on.
>>>> 
>>>> Once at it, also clean up some inefficiencies in the corresponding
>>>> parameter validation code.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> 
>>> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>>> 
>>> But doubtless should have a nestedhvm maintainer ack too.
>> 
>> Whoever that is. This was actually the first patch for XSA-35, so
>> would have gone in without people seeing this who didn't already
>> (and who one way or another approved of it).
> 
> Maybe an Ack from a nvmx maintainer at least?

Jun, Eddie?

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel