Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/nestedhvm: properly clean up after failure to set up all vCPU-s

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 23.01.13 at 16:17, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23/01/2013 14:24, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This implies that the individual destroy functions will have to remain
>> capable of being called for a vCPU that the corresponding init function
>> was never run on.
>> 
>> Once at it, also clean up some inefficiencies in the corresponding
>> parameter validation code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> 
> But doubtless should have a nestedhvm maintainer ack too.

Whoever that is. This was actually the first patch for XSA-35, so
would have gone in without people seeing this who didn't already
(and who one way or another approved of it).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel