Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/nestedhvm: properly clean up after failure to set up all vCPU-s

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 23/01/2013 15:57, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> On 23.01.13 at 16:17, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 23/01/2013 14:24, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> This implies that the individual destroy functions will have to remain
>>> capable of being called for a vCPU that the corresponding init function
>>> was never run on.
>>> 
>>> Once at it, also clean up some inefficiencies in the corresponding
>>> parameter validation code.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>> 
>> But doubtless should have a nestedhvm maintainer ack too.
> 
> Whoever that is. This was actually the first patch for XSA-35, so
> would have gone in without people seeing this who didn't already
> (and who one way or another approved of it).

Maybe an Ack from a nvmx maintainer at least?

 -- Keir

> Jan
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel