|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] X86/vMCE: handle broken page with regard to migration
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] X86/vMCE: handle broken page
with regard to migration"):
> But on the whole, is that really that much *faster* to do it that way?
> Either way you're still adding a single hypercall to the whole thing,
> and one iteration of a loop for each page; but in Jinsong's patch, the
> loop is done all at once, so presumably the compiler / processor will be
> able to do make better use of loop unrolling / registers / the pipeline
> / branch prediction / caches &c.
>
> The only way to avoid the loop would be to add an extra "have any pages
> been marked broken / dirty" bit somewhere, which is probably more
> trouble than it's worth.
OK, that makes sense.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |