Re: [Xen-devel] Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 08/11/2012 10:11, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Keir Fraser writes ("Re: Proposed new "memory capacity claim"
> hypercall/feature"):
>> On 07/11/2012 22:17, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I think this brings us back to the proposed "claim" hypercall/subop.
>>> Unless there are further objections or suggestions for different
>>> approaches, I'll commence prototyping it, OK?
>> 
>> Yes, in fact I thought you'd started already!
> 
> Sorry to play bad cop here but I am still far from convinced that a
> new hypercall is necessary or desirable.
> 
> A lot of words have been written but the concrete, detailed, technical
> argument remains to be made IMO.

I agree but prototyping != acceptance, and at least it gives something
concrete to hang the discussion on. Otherwise this longwinded thread is
going nowhere.

> Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel