Re: [Xen-devel] Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keir Fraser writes ("Re: Proposed new "memory capacity claim" 
hypercall/feature"):
> On 07/11/2012 22:17, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think this brings us back to the proposed "claim" hypercall/subop.
> > Unless there are further objections or suggestions for different
> > approaches, I'll commence prototyping it, OK?
> 
> Yes, in fact I thought you'd started already!

Sorry to play bad cop here but I am still far from convinced that a
new hypercall is necessary or desirable.

A lot of words have been written but the concrete, detailed, technical
argument remains to be made IMO.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel