[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature
- To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:23:39 +0100
- Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, "Keir \(Xen.org\)" <keir@xxxxxxx>, Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>, DarioFaggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:26:13 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 22:58 +0000, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> It's not necessary to choose the _optimal_ fit, only a probable one.
I think this is the key point which I was missing i.e. that it doesn't
need to be a totally accurate answer. Without that piece it seemed to me
that you must already have the more knowledgeable toolstack part which
others have mentioned.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
