[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 32bit xen and "claim"
> From: Tim Deegan [mailto:tim@xxxxxxx] > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 32bit xen and "claim" > > At 13:34 -0700 on 01 Nov (1351776880), Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > With the plan to obsolete the x86 32-bit hypervisor at 4.3, > > when prototyping the "claim" hypercall/subop, can I assume > > that the CONFIG_X86 code in the hypervisor and, specifically > > any separation of the concepts of xen_heap from dom_heap, > > can be ignored? > > > > Or will the ARM version of the hypervisor be requiring > > a similar separation of xen_heap vs dom_heap? > > Yes, 32-bit ARM has this separation. Hmmm... looking at page_alloc.c... does ARM overload CONFIG_X86 to mean CONFIG-32-bitness then? Seems dangerous given that various random chunks of CONFIG_X86 may be disappearing. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |