Re: [Xen-devel] 32bit xen and "claim"

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

At 13:34 -0700 on 01 Nov (1351776880), Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> With the plan to obsolete the x86 32-bit hypervisor at 4.3,
> when prototyping the "claim" hypercall/subop, can I assume
> that the CONFIG_X86 code in the hypervisor and, specifically
> any separation of the concepts of xen_heap from dom_heap,
> can be ignored?
> 
> Or will the ARM version of the hypervisor be requiring
> a similar separation of xen_heap vs dom_heap?

Yes, 32-bit ARM has this separation.

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel