[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel crash with acpi_processor, cpu_idle and intel_idle =y
>>> On 28.07.12 at 14:55, Mark van Dijk <lists+xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > So.. in that case make sure you have XEN_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y and >> > > "CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE is not set" and that should do it. >> > >> > Didn't he say that with INTEL_IDLE disabled things work (perhaps >> > in a limited way, but at least don't crash)? My understanding is >> > that things should work even with it enabled, and I was under the >> > impression that you had already taken care of disabling cpuidle >> > and cpufreq in the kernel when running on Xen... >> >> So did I - both of those (cpufreq and cpuidle) are disabled. >> >> Mark, any chance you can collect the serial output when it crashes >> please? Actually, can you get the whole bootup log with 'loglevel=8 >> debug' on the Linux command line? >> > > The sad part is that I don't have physical access to the box, the good > part is that I do have KVM and IPMI (SOL) access. > > This is what I could capture: > > http://i.imgur.com/t66FM.png The first thing intel_idle_init() does is check boot_option_idle_override, and I thought this got forced to something other than IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE by the Xen code. But at least in the current kernel that doesn't seem to be the case anymore, and thus I suppose that it's dying on the subsequent retval = cpuidle_register_driver(&intel_idle_driver); if (retval) { printk(KERN_DEBUG PREFIX "intel_idle yielding to %s", cpuidle_get_driver()->name); return retval; } since cpuidle_get_driver() is presumably returning NULL (after all xen_arch_setup() does call disable_cpuidle()). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |