[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/5] debugfs: Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32
- To: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:58:47 +0530
- Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:50:15 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On 10/24/2011 03:49 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:34:59AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
Renaming of xen functions and change unsigned to u32.
Why not just rename when you move the functions? Why the extra step?
Intention was only clarity. Yes, if this patch is an overhead, I 'll
combine both the patches.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
