[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
Wei, Gang wrote on 2011-01-25: >> 2. [VT-d]xen panic on function do_IRQ after many times NIC pass-throu >> (Intel) >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1706 > There are three points we may need to do: > 1. Figure out the root cause why the pciback could not locate the device. > I suspect the previous 'xl destroy' didn't return the device to > pcistub successfully. > > 2. Figure out the root cause why the guest pirq was not force unbound. > Just found: > Some time because if ( !IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) ) hit, so > returned with -EINVAL; Sometime if ( !(desc->status & IRQ_GUEST) ) > hit, so do not unbind. > > 3. Think about how we could prevent such cases from panic Xen. Just found sometime while doing domain_destroy the current->domain is IDLE domain, so the if ( !IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) ) hit and skip the pirq forcible unbinding. How could it happen? Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |