RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report

["Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>]

Keir Fraser wrote on 2011-01-25:
> On 25/01/2011 14:05, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 3. Think about how we could prevent such cases from panic Xen.
>> 
>> Any ideas, hints, comments, suggestions or even fixes on it?
> 
> Either the domain destroy path should forcibly unbind pirqs, or a
> non-empty set of pirq bindings should hold at least one reference to a
> domain, to prevent it being destroyed+freed.
> 
> Is forcible unbinding ever dangerous to system stability? If not
> perhaps that is best.

I agree, and will have a try in this way.

Jimmy



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel