[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report
Wei, Gang wrote on 2011-01-26: > Just found sometime while doing domain_destroy the current->domain is > IDLE domain, so the if ( !IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) ) hit and > skip the pirq forcible unbinding. How could it happen? Look like it is caused by call_rcu(&d->rcu, complete_domain_destroy) in the end of domain_destroy fn. We may need to move the check for IS_PRIV_FOR(current->domain, d) out and check it earlier in the call path if necessary. Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |