Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

 On 07/29/2010 09:34 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV 
> vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> > I wonder if blkfront could register itself with the scsi subsystem
> > rather than directly as a block device?
> I bet that would mean it would have to deal with SCSI command blocks
> and stuff, so I doubt it.
Well, random ide/ata devices are now part of scsi via libata, and they 
presumably can not deal with raw scsi commands.
    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel