[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, 
PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> I wonder if blkfront could register itself with the scsi subsystem 
> rather than directly as a block device?
I bet that would mean it would have to deal with SCSI command blocks
and stuff, so I doubt it.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
- References:
- [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated,	backward compatibility etc
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
  
   
    
     |