| 
    
 [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, 
> PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Well, no, they can't, because their bootloader probably doesn't
> > > understand anything besides what they're actually using.
> > 
> > they only have to change the device name, not the device class
> 
> Surely you can't steal only one minor number ?
yes, that's what we do.
> 
> > > Certainly stealing the major number for scsi disks seems quite
> > > dangerous.  pv-usb is hardly that unlikely a scenario.
> >  
> > we are not doing that for pvusb
> 
> pv-usb => usb mass storage => scsi disks
 
I mean there is no such thing as pv-usb.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 
  | 
  
![]()  | 
            
         Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our  |