[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pt_msix_init: Error: Can't map physical MSI-X table: Invalid argument
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Cinco, Dante wrote: >> I get the above error message when I boot the domU (Linux 2.6.30.1). I'm >> using Xen 3.5-unstable (changeset 20303) with >> pv_ops kernel 2.6.31.1. I use pci-stub to hide the device so that I can >> assign/pass it through to domU. The error is >> coming from ioemu-xxx/hw/pt-msi.c. I think it is complaining about the >> table_off that is part of the mmap() call: >> >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16, >> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED, >> fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off); >> >> When I printed table_off, its value is 0x4100 (not page-aligned) which is >> consistent with the BAR4 offset of the PCI >> device (see below). I think mmap() requires the last argument to be a >> multiple of the page size and results is a map >> error if it is not. Here's the partial output of "lspci -vv -s 0:07:0.1" >> from dom0: >> >> 07:00.0 Fibre Channel: PMC-Sierra Inc. Device 8032 (rev 05) >> Subsystem: Atto Technology Device 003c >> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes >> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 >> Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ >> Queue=0/1 Enable+ >> Address: 00000000fee11000 Data: 405e >> Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01 >> DevCap: MaxPayload 4096 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s >> <4us, L1 unlimited >> ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- >> Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Mask- TabSize=9 >> Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00004100 >> PBA: BAR=4 offset=00004000 >> >> I'm able to workaround this problem by modifying pt-msi.c: force offset to >> zero in mmap() and on the next line, adjust >> the pointer by table_off: >> >> table_off_adjust = table_off & 0x0fff; >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16 + >> table_off_adjust, >> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED, >> fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off - >> table_off_adjust); >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = (void *)((char *)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base >> + table_off_adjust); >> >> Ideally, I should only be applying this to my device but since I'm not >> passing any other device that use MSI, I don't see >> any negative effect. In addition, my device only uses MSI and not MSI-X. >> >> Obviously, this is a custom hack but I was wondering if there is a cleaner >> solution for this. Is a non-page aligned BAR >> offset unusual? When I boot Linux 2.6.30.1 on bare metal (no Xen), I don't >> see this error. > > I think this workaround is not so bad, you just need to keep > table_off_adjust around because it has to be used in munmap too. Where is the respective munmap call ? -Bruce _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |