[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pt_msix_init: Error: Can't map physical MSI-X table: Invalid argument
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Bruce Edge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Stefano Stabellini > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Cinco, Dante wrote: > >> I get the above error message when I boot the domU (Linux 2.6.30.1). I'm > >> using Xen 3.5-unstable (changeset 20303) with > >> pv_ops kernel 2.6.31.1. I use pci-stub to hide the device so that I can > >> assign/pass it through to domU. The error is > >> coming from ioemu-xxx/hw/pt-msi.c. I think it is complaining about the > >> table_off that is part of the mmap() call: > >> > >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16, > >> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED, > >> fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off); > >> > >> When I printed table_off, its value is 0x4100 (not page-aligned) which is > >> consistent with the BAR4 offset of the PCI > >> device (see below). I think mmap() requires the last argument to be a > >> multiple of the page size and results is a map > >> error if it is not. Here's the partial output of "lspci -vv -s 0:07:0.1" > >> from dom0: > >> > >> 07:00.0 Fibre Channel: PMC-Sierra Inc. Device 8032 (rev 05) > >> Subsystem: Atto Technology Device 003c > >> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes > >> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 > >> Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ > >> Queue=0/1 Enable+ > >> Address: 00000000fee11000 Data: 405e > >> Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01 > >> DevCap: MaxPayload 4096 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s > >> <4us, L1 unlimited > >> ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- > >> Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Mask- TabSize=9 > >> Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00004100 > >> PBA: BAR=4 offset=00004000 > >> > >> I'm able to workaround this problem by modifying pt-msi.c: force offset to > >> zero in mmap() and on the next line, adjust > >> the pointer by table_off: > >> > >> table_off_adjust = table_off & 0x0fff; > >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = mmap(0, total_entries * 16 + > >> table_off_adjust, > >> PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_LOCKED, > >> fd, dev->msix->table_base + table_off - > >> table_off_adjust); > >> dev->msix->phys_iomem_base = (void *)((char > >> *)dev->msix->phys_iomem_base + table_off_adjust); > >> > >> Ideally, I should only be applying this to my device but since I'm not > >> passing any other device that use MSI, I don't see > >> any negative effect. In addition, my device only uses MSI and not MSI-X. > >> > >> Obviously, this is a custom hack but I was wondering if there is a cleaner > >> solution for this. Is a non-page aligned BAR > >> offset unusual? When I boot Linux 2.6.30.1 on bare metal (no Xen), I don't > >> see this error. > > > > I think this workaround is not so bad, you just need to keep > > table_off_adjust around because it has to be used in munmap too. > > Where is the respective munmap call ? > in the same file: pt-msi.c. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |