| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix stdvga performance for 32bit ops
 
To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>From: "Robert Phillips" <rsphillips@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:37:39 -0400Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Ben Guthro <bguthro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:12:45 -0800Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;	b=XApHexB2T9O7TkAgyHDuyXf6Jx6Uh2GZbqXeNaI23+i8Oc/5HnVEP/98WfhchYdVhQAy/K8fTchK9i4bxYxobHmV1FXr5uIWJm1XQQ2XsJE879A/U0M8KwPMzwzeHeVpBBC/u249AoFDkF3mHeIURFTTthgTCoSpM/KIkzhen8c=List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> Yes, it should be 511.
 Thanks.
 -- rsp
 
 
 On 10/31/07, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
511 entries? 511*8 + 8 bytes for the read/write pointers == 4096?
 -- Keir
 
 On 31/10/07 20:28, "Ben Guthro" <bguthro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
 
 Corrected a bug in the stdvga code where it did notproperly handle 32 bit operations.
 The buf_ioreq_t can now store 32 bits of data.
 Because this increases its size to 8 bytes,
 only 510 elements fit in the buffered_iopage
 (down from 672 elements).
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |