[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xense-devel] [Q] about vTPM
>-----Original Message----- >From: xense-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:xense-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >Martin Hermanowski >Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 6:43 AM >To: Ronald Perez >Cc: xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [Xense-devel] [Q] about vTPM > >One thing that surprised me after reading the report was, that the >current vTPM implementation in xen-testing did not do any measurements >to PCRs, and that it seems like the vTPM is created when the tpm-xen >module is loaded in DomU, and not when the DomU is created. > >If I understood the vTPM architecture correctly, this is not >implementation specific (this is only the vtpm_managerd part, right?), >but a Xen issue. I think a couple of different issues are being combined here. 1) As an artifact of xen's FE/BE structure and the way we *were* signaling the vtpm manager about new domains, a new VTPM instance wasn't created until the FE driver executed and told the BE about it. When Dom0/DomU merged into one kernel tree, the FE has become a module, which is far to late to start the vTPM. This, however, has changed in the unstable tree. The instance is now created during domain construction before the domain starts executing. 2) The boot process and xen and the currently trusted dom 0 are not measured into the TPM. This requires you to install a TPM enhanced GRUB on your system. This is not included in xen, but is a standard part of TPM enabling your linux-based system. 3) When the guest comes up, PCRRead indicates that all the PCRs are empty. This has 2 causes. One is that standard linux does not have a TPM measurement facility. If you want your OS measured, you will need to install something like IBM's Integrity Measurement Agent (IMA). Second, we are currently not preloading any of the low PCRs with appropriate boot information. This is mostly because we haven't bottomed out on what they should be, and TCG hasn't declared the correct behavior in the form of a spec. There are legitimate arguments in several different directions, depending on a variety of factors. I would be happy to break out into a discussion about various was to represent a virtual environment in VTPM, but I would want to take it off the list as it is not a xen discussion. -Vinnie Scarlata Trusted Platforms Lab System Technology Lab, CTG Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Xense-devel mailing list Xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xense-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |