[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xense-devel] [Q] about vTPM
Ronald Perez wrote: > > Martin Hermanowski wrote on 06/30/2006 05:10:24 AM: > >> So there are two different VTPM implementation at the moment? Are there >> plans to release the one described in the research report? > > Martin, > > I think it would be more accurate to say that there are at least two > different vTPM implementations for Xen (supporting a diversity of vTPM > implementations was one of the design points from the beginning). OK > While the vTPM implementation described in the IBM research report is > not available (at least not as open source), we have discussed releasing > in the past. However, we currently have no plans to do so. We feel that > version supported by Intel, based on an existing open source TPM > emulator, should be made adequate for most purposes. If you feel > differently, please let us know. One thing that surprised me after reading the report was, that the current vTPM implementation in xen-testing did not do any measurements to PCRs, and that it seems like the vTPM is created when the tpm-xen module is loaded in DomU, and not when the DomU is created. If I understood the vTPM architecture correctly, this is not implementation specific (this is only the vtpm_managerd part, right?), but a Xen issue. I will try to switch to xen-unstable, to have the latest vTPM development that's available. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Hermanowski http://martin.hermanowski.name _______________________________________________ Xense-devel mailing list Xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xense-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |