[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Windows "modern.ie" Network Problem
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 10:51 -0200, Wanderson Camargo wrote: > $ xm list | grep ie9-win7 > ie9-win7 23 2048 1 -b---- > 35.5 > > $ brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > xenbr0 8000.d4ae5287f28e no eth0 > vif1.0 > vif2.0 > vif23.0 > vif3.0 > vif4.0 > vif4.0-emu > vif5.0 > vif6.0 > $ ifconfig -a | grep vif23 -A 6 > vif23.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:166 errors:0 dropped:3 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:32 > RX bytes:5500 (5.3 KiB) TX bytes:19630 (19.1 KiB) > AFAICT this is all correctly setup from the host PoV, it even shows that it is passing packets (both TX and RX) perhaps there is something in the guest configuration or logs? "xenstore-ls -fp" should contain information saying what state the PV device is in, in particular the value of the "state" node for the device front and backend, e.g. /local/domain/23/device/vif/0/state and /local/domain/0/backend/vif/23/0 xenstore-ls -fp /local/domain/23/device/vif/0/ xenstore-ls -fp /local/domain/0/backend/vif/23/0 (change the 23 if you reboot). Other things to check would be your physical infrastructure for e.g. mac address filtering in the switches and also any firewalls etc (including in dom0 and elsewhere). > About my NAT question: I don't know, it looks like Xen is trying to > create my Windows box with NAT and others with bridge. It's crazy, I > know. Why do you think that? Domain 23 here appears to be correctly setup with bridging. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |