Re: [Xen-users] small cluster storage configuration?

[Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/10/11 22:53, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> On 10/10/11 22:35, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> > That's why I'm trying to avoid using DRBD - looking for an alternative
> > that will
> > replicate data across all four nodes, and allow for continued operation
> > if one
> > (or possibly two) node(s) fail. It looks like GlusterFS, VastSky, and
> > Sheepdog would
> > do this but development on VastSky seems to have stalled, and Sheepdog
> > is KVM-only.
> I just looked at GlusterFS and VastSky - these seems to be aimed at
> aggregating storage located across different servers. Correct me if I'm
> wrong, but this seems to me the opposite of what you are looking for:
> you want HA, so data needs to be replicated to be available via
> different servers, right?
Continued reading some more on VastSky. This seems to offer redundancy 
too, by means of mirroring. 4 nodes might be not enough for that though. 
Also, I wonder if it is suitable for things like live migration, which 
iSCSI and AoE can do.
B.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users