Re: [Xen-users] Bonded interfaces with trunk and iscsi SAN

["Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/16/2011 3:41 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Donny Brooks<dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Ok, I added the IP information to the ifcfg-br20 file and ifdown/ifup
>>> that
>>> interface. I am able to ping the 192.168.130.X range but nothing in the
>>> 192.168.131.X, 192.168.132.X, or 192.168.133.X ranges. Here is the
>>> contents
>>> of that file:
>>>
>>> DEVICE=br20
>>> TYPE=Bridge
>>> BOOTPROTO=static
>>> IPADDR=192.168.130.51
>>> NETMASK=255.255.0.0
>>> NETWORK=192.168.0.0
>>> ONBOOT=yes
>>
>> Does all host in 192.168.X.X use the same /16 (255.255.0.0) netmask?
>> A common error is when some hosts use /16, while others use /24.
>>
> The only thing on that vlan is the SAN. Now that I think about it the
> windows machine is set to a /24 on each interface. So it may be that the SAN
> is set for /24 instead of /16. Now just to figure out how to have 4
> "interfaces" each with a /24 subnet...... hmmmm. :)

That's easy. ifcfg-br20:1, ifcfg-br20:2, etc. :D

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users