Re: [Xen-users] Bonded interfaces with trunk and iscsi SAN

[Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/16/2011 3:41 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Donny Brooks<dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > Ok, I added the IP information to the ifcfg-br20 file and ifdown/ifup that
> > interface. I am able to ping the 192.168.130.X range but nothing in the
> > 192.168.131.X, 192.168.132.X, or 192.168.133.X ranges. Here is the contents
> > of that file:
> >
> > DEVICE=br20
> > TYPE=Bridge
> > BOOTPROTO=static
> > IPADDR=192.168.130.51
> > NETMASK=255.255.0.0
> > NETWORK=192.168.0.0
> > ONBOOT=yes
> Does all host in 192.168.X.X use the same /16 (255.255.0.0) netmask?
> A common error is when some hosts use /16, while others use /24.
The only thing on that vlan is the SAN. Now that I think about it the 
windows machine is set to a /24 on each interface. So it may be that the 
SAN is set for /24 instead of /16. Now just to figure out how to have 4 
"interfaces" each with a /24 subnet...... hmmmm. :)
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users