[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Graphical virtualisation management system
Thanks for sharing your views. > So far, I've looked at: > * Convirture 2.0 which looks pretty, but doesn't > work with iSCSI, > and the docs are all horribly out-of-date making it very > hard to > troubleshoot; ConVirt 2.0 does support iscsi. Also, could you point out "out of date" documentation. We would like to fix this pronto. Thanks /Jd --- On Thu, 6/24/10, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [Xen-users] Graphical virtualisation management system > To: "XEN Mailing List" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 11:32 AM > What is everyone using to manage > their virtualisation setup? Anyone > using a pre-packaged management system like ConVirt, > oVirt, > Virt-Manager, etc? Everyone rolling their own > management scripts? > Something else? > > Right now, we're using our home-grown kvmctl script (as > seen in the > KVM wiki) to manage KVM-based VMs on Debian and Ubuntu > Server. It's > working ok, but limited to a single host, so there's no > redundancy or > shared storage or migration possible in our current setup. > > We want to move to a multi-tiered, SAN-based virtualisation > setup, but > can't find a VM management tool that handles both KVM and > Xen (we have > some old Opteron hardware that doesn't support SVM), and > does not > require Linux from end-to-end. For example, we want > to run FreeBSD + > ZFS on our storage servers, exporting storage via iSCSI (or > NFS). We > want to run a minimal Debian/Ubuntu install on the VM hosts > (just to > boot and run the management agents), with all of the VMs > getting their > storage via iSCSI. With a separate box acting as the > management > system. Preferably with a web-based management GUI, > but that's more > of an "nice to have" than a hard requirement. > > >From the research I've done into the VM management > systems available > for KVM/Xen, either Linux is required on every host > (including the > storage servers), or they don't support iSCSI (or > off-server shared > storage of any kind), or they require an X server > installed, or they > only support one of Xen/KVM, or they are geared toward > managing a > single server (desktop). > > So, if you have a setup similar to above (multiple physical > servers, > separate storage, etc), what are you using to manage > it? Is it free, > open-source, shareware, pay-ware, proprietary, abandonware, > something > else? > > So far, I've looked at: > * Convirture 2.0 which looks pretty, but doesn't > work with iSCSI, > and the docs are all horribly out-of-date making it very > hard to > troubleshoot; > * oVirt which requires Fedora/CentOS/RedHat on > everything; > * virt-manager which requires X and seems to be more > desktop-oriented; > * ProxMox which doesn't support Xen. > > What else is available? Where else should I be > looking? > > Any suggestions on what to look at greatly > appreciated. Any > suggestions on how to improve our setup also greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks. > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@xxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |