RE: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array

["Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

 

---

From: Adi Kriegisch [mailto:kriegisch@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 17/06/2010 14:03
To: Jonathan Tripathy
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] RAID10 Array

Hi!

> Looking at this page https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HighlyAvailableAoETarget
> they seem to have made a linux "bond" called bond0 and are telling the AoE
> target to use that. This confuses me...
> Would it be of any benifit to create a "mode 4" bond and use 802.3ad with ATA
> over Ethernet? Or would that be just a waste, when AoE can use the interfaces
> directly?
ggaoed for example can handle multiple interfaces in the configuration and
is designed to deliver highest performance with for example automatically
load balancing over several NICs.
If you want to use vblade you might be better off using bonding because
vblade cannot handle several interfaces in one instance. You'll get another
performance penalty when using several instances of vblade listening on
different interfaces.
I am not sure if LACP enhances performance in your case: I think from one
server to the other you will only get 1GBit; for LACP to work as expected
you need many-to-many or many-to-one connections. All pakets belonging to a
connection will use the same wire. This article has some
details: http://serverfault.com/questions/8512/multiplexed-1-gbps-ethernet
also Wikipedia has some information on this.

Another thing is that you loose the ability of having a redundancy in the
switching backend.

-- Adi

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So if I use ggaoed and just put all 4 NICs into its config file, that should allow me to get 4Gbit of bandwidth? And no configuration is required on the switch?

BTW, does 802.3ad "mode 4" use LACP? Or I am getting mixed up?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users