|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with xen 4.0 with pvops kernel 2.6.32.15
On 06/09/2010 11:34 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:13AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>
>> I've captured an exact error message in text virt-install console :-
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> error 2 reading header: cpio: Bad magic
>>
>> Running anaconda 13.42, the Fedora system installer - please wait.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> I guess that means the file anaconda downloaded is corrupt.. ie. networking
> is broken.
>
I would expect that any cpio wrapped up in an rpm would have to go
through a number of layers of sha1/md5/signature/etc checking before the
cpio header gets checked. If its making its way through that and then
finding a bad magic in the cpio, it would seem to be memory or disk
corruption.
J
> -- Pasi
>
>
>
>> Boris.
>> P.S. Xen 4.0.1-rc2-pre, 2.6.32.15 (the most recent commit)
>>
>> --- On Wed, 6/9/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with xen 4.0 with
>> pvops kernel
>> 2.6.32.15
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2010, 8:54 AM
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:47:42AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>> > I was able to virt-install F13 PV DomU in nographics mode under Xen
>> > 4.0.1-rc2-pre (2.6.32.15 pvops
>> c2cb3df04eb3ff68d0de102b2acacc9b8616e659)
>> > at the point of extracting data from Apache mirror at Dom0 on top of
>> > Ubuntu 10.04 ( text console mode message)
>> > -------------------------------------------------
>> > 2 extracting cpio errors. Bad Magic
>> > -------------------------------------------------
>> > However, virt-install proceeds further to promt "set up VNC at DomU"
>> > and completed successfully.
>> > VNC mode cannot pass through this extractions. It just hangs.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, there's something weird going on..
>>
>> During the weekend I *think* I was successfully able to install guests
>> when they didn't have vfb set up at all.. but when I set up vfb (ie. used
>> virt-manager)
>> the VM's started acting weird.. network problems, and problems in general,
>> VM's freezing..
>>
>> I haven't had time to confirm that yet..
>>
>> -- Pasi
>>
>> > Boris.
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 6/7/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[1]pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <[2]pasik@xxxxxx>
>> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with xen 4.0
>> with
>> > pvops kernel 2.6.32.15
>> > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[3]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <[4]jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,
>> > [5]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, [6]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > [7]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Date: Monday, June 7, 2010, 3:55 AM
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:54:11AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>> > > Virt-install hangs attempting to retrieve updates.img from
>> Apache
>> > Mirror
>> > > setup at Dom0
>> > > with kernel 2.6.32.15
>> > > It doesn't happen with 2.6.32.10 (12,14 final).
>> > > Environment Xen 4.0 Dom0 on top Ubuntu 10.04 Server. Libvirt is
>> > 0.8.0 .
>> > > Attempting to virt-install F13 PV DomU in vnc mode.
>> > >
>> > > I believe that builds are consistent.
>> > > Runtime behavior is the same for .10, .14, .15. Seems to be
>> > communicating
>> > > problem between DomU and Dom0 during HTTP download.
>> > >
>> >
>> > I'm seeing PV domU network issues aswell.. when running Xen 4.0.0 on
>> > Fedora 13.
>> > I'll have to dig more into it..
>> >
>> > -- Pasi
>> >
>> > > Boris.
>> > >
>> > > --- On Sun, 6/6/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
>> <[1][8]jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[2][9]jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems with
>> xen
>> > 4.0 with
>> > > pvops kernel 2.6.32.15
>> > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[3][10]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Cc: [4][11]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > [5][12]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > > [6][13]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > Date: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 12:43 PM
>> > >
>> > > On 06/06/2010 03:19 AM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>> > > > Network issues when working with DomUs in 2.6.32.14 and
>> finally
>> > been
>> > > > fixed,
>> > > > seem to appear again in 2.6.32.15. Reverting to back to
>> > xen/stable -
>> > > > 2.6.32.10
>> > > > works as a fix again.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > There are no substantial differences between 2.6.32.14 and
>> .15.
>> > If
>> > > there are any differences in behaviour between them, then I'd
>> > suspect
>> > > some inconsistency from boot to boot, or in your kernel build
>> > process.
>> > >
>> > > J
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Boris
>> > > >
>> > > > --- On *Thu, 6/3/10, Luís Silva
>> > /<[1][7][14]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>/*
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > From: Luís Silva <[2][8][15]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems
>> with
>> > xen 4.0
>> > > > with pvops kernel
>> > > > To: "Boris Derzhavets"
>> <[3][9][16]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <[4][10][17]jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,
>> > > > [5][11][18]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > [6][12][19]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > > Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 6:20 AM
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for the suggestion, xen/stable works ok for me.
>> Only
>> > > > problem is that I have to disable offload do get dhcp
>> to
>> > work on
>> > > > domU, but the problem I described before doesn't exist
>> in
>> > this
>> > > > kernel. Later today I'm going to try a previous build I
>> > have based
>> > > > on stable-2.6.32.x (2.6.32.13) to check if it already
>> had
>> > this
>> > > > problem or not and I'll post the results.
>> > > >
>> > > > Luís
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:26 -0700, Boris Derzhavets
>> wrote:
>> > > >> Could you,please, build and try 2.6.32.10 (
>> xen/stable) ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Boris.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --- On *Wed, 6/2/10, Luís Silva
>> > > **/<[7][13][20]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>/*
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> From: Luís Silva
>> <[8][14][21]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >> Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] ARP problems
>> with
>> > xen
>> > > >> 4.0 with pvops kernel
>> > > >> To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge"
>> <[9][15][22]jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>> > > >> Cc: [10][16][23]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> > > [11][17][24]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > >> Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 2:53 PM
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Hello,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:06 -0700, Jeremy
>> Fitzhardinge
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>> On 06/02/2010 01:47 AM, Luís Silva wrote:
>> > > >>> > Hello,
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > I'm using the latest stable-2.6.32.x. I already
>> > tried
>> > > "ethtool -K
>> > > >>> > <bridge> tx off", but that didn't make any
>> > difference.
>> > > Also, this only
>> > > >>> > happen with pv, in hvm mode all works ok and
>> the
>> > domU sees
>> > > the arp
>> > > >>> > messages...
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Yes, ARP is a new twist on network problems. I'm
>> > guessing
>> > > you're using
>> > > >>> hvm without stubdoms, which means that its
>> networking
>> > > originates from
>> > > >>> qemu within dom0, whereas PV and HVM+stubdom
>> comes
>> > via
>> > > netback.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> Yes, when I mentioned hvm I was talking about hvm
>> > without
>> > > >> stubdoms. I haven't tried those yet.
>> > > >>> But aside from that, I'm stumped. Are you
>> running
>> > any
>> > > firewalls on
>> > > >>> either side? Can you try disabling all the
>> offloads
>> > (tx,
>> > > rx, gso, tso)
>> > > >>> on all the relevent interfaces (bridge, netback,
>> > within the
>> > > guest) and
>> > > >>> see if that changes anything?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> J
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Ok, this is the bridge interface:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> brctl show
>> > > >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled
>> > interfaces
>> > > >> virbr0 8000.feffffffffff no
>> vif1.0
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ifconfig virbr0
>> > > >> virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
>> > c2:ef:67:2b:a4:23
>> > > >> inet addr:192.168.120.254
>> > Bcast:192.168.120.255
>> > > Mask:255.255.255.0
>> > > >> inet6 addr: fe80::c0ef:67ff:fe2b:a423/64
>> > Scope:Link
>> > > >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
>> > Metric:1
>> > > >> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0
>> overruns:0
>> > frame:0
>> > > >> TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0
>> overruns:0
>> > > carrier:0
>> > > >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > >> RX bytes:0 (0.0
>> > > >> B)
>> > > >> TX bytes:4662 (4.6 KB)
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I'm not using firewall other than the rules
>> defined by
>> > > >> libvirt. DomU has no firewall and the rules in
>> dom0
>> > are only
>> > > >> these (virbr0 is natted to the outside, virbr1 is
>> > routed. The
>> > > >> result is the same in either one of them):
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo iptables -L -n -v
>> > > >> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 241K packets, 53M
>> bytes)
>> > > >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out
>> source
>> > > destination
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:53
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:53
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:67
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:67
>> > > >> 8 515 ACCEPT udp -- virbr0 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:53
>> > > >> 0 0
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ACCEPT tcp -- virbr0 * 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:53
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT udp -- virbr0 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:67
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- virbr0 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:67
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
>> > > >> pkts bytes target
>> > > >> prot
>> > > >> opt in out source
>> destination
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- * virbr1
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 192.168.121.0/24
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- virbr1 *
>> > > 192.168.121.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- virbr1 virbr1
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT all -- * virbr1
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT all -- virbr1 *
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >> 13 3448 ACCEPT all -- * virbr0
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 192.168.120.0/24
>> > > >> state
>> > > >> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
>> > > >> 16 1374 ACCEPT all -- virbr0 *
>> > > 192.168.120.0/24 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 ACCEPT all -- virbr0 virbr0
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT all -- * virbr0
>> > 0.0.0.0/0
>> > > 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >> 0 0 REJECT all --
>> > > >> virbr0
>> > > >> * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
>> > reject-with
>> > > icmp-port-unreachable
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 233K packets, 27M
>> bytes)
>> > > >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out
>> source
>> > > destination
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> And these are the various offload parameters as
>> set at
>> > boot:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Offload parameters for virbr0:
>> > > >> rx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> tx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> scatter-gather: on
>> > > >> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> udp-fragmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> generic-receive-offload: off
>> > > >> large-receive-offload: off
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Offload parameters for vif1.0:
>> > > >> rx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> tx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> scatter-gather: on
>> > > >> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> udp-fragmentation-offload: off
>> > > >> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> generic-receive-offload: off
>> > > >> large-receive-offload: off
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Offload parameters for eth0:
>> > > >> rx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> tx-checksumming: on
>> > > >> scatter-gather: on
>> > > >> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>> > > >> udp-fragmentation-offload: off
>> > > >> generic-segmentation-offload: off
>> > > >> generic-receive-offload: off
>> > > >> large-receive-offload: off
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> To disable all checksuming I run the following
>> > commands:
>> > > >> dom0:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo ethtool -K virbr0 tx off sg off tso off gso
>> off
>> > gro off
>> > > >> sudo ethtool -K vif1.0 tx off sg off tso off gso
>> off
>> > gro off
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> domU
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo ethtool -K eth0 tx off sg off tso off gso
>> off gro
>> > off
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> This managed to get all parameter to off in the
>> > mentioned
>> > > >> interfaces, but unfortunately the result is the
>> same.
>> > The arp
>> > > >> requests get to vif1.0, but not to eth0 on the
>> domU.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> sudo tcpdump -i vif1.0 -n -vv arp
>> > > >> tcpdump: WARNING: vif1.0: no IPv4 address assigned
>> > > >> tcpdump: listening on vif1.0, link-type EN10MB
>> > (Ethernet),
>> > > capture size 96 bytes
>> > > >> 19:43:51.233378 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:52.233164 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:53.233166 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:54.684214 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:55.684218 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >> 19:43:56.684232 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len
>> 4),
>> > Request
>> > > who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I hope this information is enough. If I can
>> provide
>> > anything
>> > > >> else to help debug or test, please just ask! ;)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks in advance,
>> > > >> Luís
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > Thanks,
>> > > >>> > Luís
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 18:20 -0700, Jeremy
>> > Fitzhardinge
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> >> On 06/01/2010 05:38 PM, Luís Silva wrote:
>> > > >>> >> > Hello,
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Finally I managed to get a xen 4.0 working
>> on
>> > ubuntu
>> > > 10.04 with pvops
>> > > >>> >> > kernel and libvirt. However I am having some
>> > problems
>> > > with
>> > > >>> >> > networking... after initial installation
>> with
>> > > netinstall image in hvm
>> > > >>> >> > mode, when I transform the vm in xen pv (via
>> > pygrub
>> > > with the current
>> > > >>> >> > ubuntu kernel), networking startEd to act
>> > weird...
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Basically I'm not using a network script
>> from
>> > xen. I
>> > > define a bridge
>> > > >>> >> > (manually or via libvirt, the result is the
>> > same) and I
>> > > use vif-bridge
>> > > >>> >> > to connect the vif to it. But now the weird
>> part
>> > comes:
>> > > I can
>> > > >>> >> > communicate from domU to dom0, but not the
>> other
>> > way
>> > > >>> around,
>> > > >>> unless I
>> > > >>> >> > keep a ping running from domU to dom0...
>> That's
>> > right,
>> > > weird... while
>> > > >>> >> > trying the ping from dom0 to domU, I used
>> > tcpdump both
>> > > on the bridge,
>> > > >>> >> > on the vif and on the eth0 in the domU. The
>> arp
>> > packets
>> > > never get to
>> > > >>> >> > domU, but they appear both in the bridge
>> and the
>> > vif
>> > > sniff's...
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> What version of kernel are you using in dom0
>> and
>> > domU?
>> > > There was a
>> > > >>> >> netback bug which caused problems with
>> dom0<->domU
>> > > communication, but it
>> > > >>> >> has been fixed for a while in 2.6.32 (but only
>> > recently
>> > > in .31). The
>> > > >>> >> workaround is to disable tx checksum offload
>> on
>> > your
>> > > bridge (ethtool -K
>> > > >>> >> <bridge> tx off).
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> J
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Here is the bridge:
>> > > >>> >> > ifconfig virbr0
>> > > >>> >> > virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
>> > > fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> inet addr:192.168.120.254 Bcast:192.168.120.255
>> > > Mask:255.255.255.0
>> > > >>> >> > inet6 addr:
>> > fe80::7cee:4bff:fe82:e63f/64
>> > > Scope:Link
>> > > >>> >> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
>> > MTU:1500
>> > > Metric:1
>> > > >>> >> > RX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0
>> > overruns:0
>> > > frame:0
>> > > >>> >> > TX packets:226 errors:0 dropped:0
>> > overruns:0
>> > > carrier:0
>> > > >>> >> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > >>> >> > RX bytes:952 (952.0 B) TX
>> bytes:13953
>> > (13.9
>> > > KB)
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > brctl show
>> > > >>> >> > bridge name bridge id STP enabled
>> > > interfaces
>> > > >>> >> > virbr0 8000.feffffffffff no
>> > vif5.0
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump -i virbr0 -vv -n
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump: listening on virbr0, link-type
>> EN10MB
>> > > (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:25.945151 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF],
>> > > >>> proto ICMP (1),
>> > > >>> length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 1, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:26.945361 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 2, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:27.945420 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 3, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:28.945362 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 4, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:29.945364 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317,
>> > > >>> seq 5, length
>> > > >>> 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:30.944300 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:30.945359 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 6, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:31.944297 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:31.945444 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> > 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP
>> echo
>> > request,
>> > > id 10317, seq 7, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:32.944294 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:32.945401 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0,
>> > offset 0,
>> > > flags [DF], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> 192.168.120.254 > 192.168.120.1: ICMP echo
>> request,
>> > id
>> > > 10317, seq 8, length 64
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:33.947293 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:34.947373 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:35.947353 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:37.948352 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:38.948399 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:39.948376 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:31:40.949356 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request
>> > > >>> who-has
>> > > >>> 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump -i vif5.0 -vv -n
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump: WARNING: vif5.0: no IPv4 address
>> > assigned
>> > > >>> >> > tcpdump: listening on vif5.0, link-type
>> EN10MB
>> > > (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:19.956358 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:20.956358 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:21.956359 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:23.957311 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:24.957312 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length
>> > > >>> 28
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> 01:32:25.957359 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:27.958360 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:28.958310 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> > 01:32:29.958362 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4
>> (len
>> > 4),
>> > > Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell 192.168.120.254, length 28
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Forwarding and iptables don't seem to be the
>> > problem,
>> > > because if I
>> > > >>> >> > initiate a ping from domU (at the same time
>> as
>> > the
>> > > failing one from
>> > > >>> >> > dom0), the ping in dom0 starts to work. As
>> soon
>> > as I
>> > > stop the ping in
>> > > >>> >> > domU, the one in dom0 starts failing
>> again...
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Is anyone having the same
>> > > >>> problem? Is this a bug
>> > > >>> in the kernel? In
>> > > >>> >> > dom0 or domU?
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Thanks in advance,
>> > > >>> >> > Luís
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>> >> > Xen-devel mailing list
>> > > >>> >> > [12][18][25]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > <mailto:[13][19][26]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > <mailto:[14][20][27]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >>> >> >
>> [15][21][28]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>> >> Xen-devel mailing list
>> > > >>> >> [16][22][29]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > <mailto:[17][23][30]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > <mailto:[18][24][31]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >>> >>
>> [19][25][32]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>> > > >>
>> > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >> Xen-users mailing list
>> > > >> [20][26][33]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > >> [21][27][34]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Xen-users mailing list
>> > > > [22][28][35]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > >
>> </mc/compose?to=[23][29][36]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > [24][30][37]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > References
>> > >
>> > > Visible links
>> > > 1. file:///mc/compose?to=[31][38]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 2. file:///mc/compose?to=[32][39]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 3. file:///mc/compose?to=[33][40]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> > > 4. file:///mc/compose?to=[34][41]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > > 5. file:///mc/compose?to=[35][42]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 6. file:///mc/compose?to=[36][43]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 7. file:///mc/compose?to=[37][44]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 8. file:///mc/compose?to=[38][45]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 9. file:///mc/compose?to=[39][46]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > > 10. file:///mc/compose?to=[40][47]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 11. file:///mc/compose?to=[41][48]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 12. file:///mc/compose?to=[42][49]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 13. file:///mc/compose?to=[43][50]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 14. file:///mc/compose?to=[44][51]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 15. [45][52]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > > 16. file:///mc/compose?to=[46][53]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 17. file:///mc/compose?to=[47][54]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 18. file:///mc/compose?to=[48][55]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 19. [49][56]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > > 20. file:///mc/compose?to=[50][57]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 21. [51][58]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > > 22. file:///mc/compose?to=[52][59]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 23. file:///mc/compose?to=[53][60]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > 24. [54][61]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Xen-devel mailing list
>> > > [55][62]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > [56][63]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Xen-devel mailing list
>> > [57][64]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > [58][65]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> >
>> > References
>> >
>> > Visible links
>> > 1. file:///mc/compose?to=[66]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > 2. file:///mc/compose?to=[67]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > 3. file:///mc/compose?to=[68]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> > 4. file:///mc/compose?to=[69]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 5. file:///mc/compose?to=[70]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 6. file:///mc/compose?to=[71]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 7. file:///mc/compose?to=[72]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 8. file:///mc/compose?to=[73]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 9. file:///mc/compose?to=[74]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> > 10. file:///mc/compose?to=[75]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > 11. file:///mc/compose?to=[76]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 12. file:///mc/compose?to=[77]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 13. file:///mc/compose?to=[78]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 14. file:///mc/compose?to=[79]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 15. file:///mc/compose?to=[80]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > 16. file:///mc/compose?to=[81]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 17. file:///mc/compose?to=[82]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 18. file:///mc/compose?to=[83]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 19. file:///mc/compose?to=[84]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 20. file:///mc/compose?to=[85]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 21. [86]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > 22. file:///mc/compose?to=[87]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 23. file:///mc/compose?to=[88]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 24. file:///mc/compose?to=[89]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 25. [90]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > 26. file:///mc/compose?to=[91]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 27. [92]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > 28. file:///mc/compose?to=[93]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 29. file:///mc/compose?to=[94]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 30. [95]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > 31. file:///mc/compose?to=[96]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 32. file:///mc/compose?to=[97]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 33. file:///mc/compose?to=[98]bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> > 34. file:///mc/compose?to=[99]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > 35. file:///mc/compose?to=[100]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 36. file:///mc/compose?to=[101]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 37. file:///mc/compose?to=[102]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 38. file:///mc/compose?to=[103]luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 39. file:///mc/compose?to=[104]jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> > 40. file:///mc/compose?to=[105]xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 41. file:///mc/compose?to=[106]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 42. file:///mc/compose?to=[107]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 43. file:///mc/compose?to=[108]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 44. file:///mc/compose?to=[109]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 45. [110]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > 46. file:///mc/compose?to=[111]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 47. file:///mc/compose?to=[112]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 48. file:///mc/compose?to=[113]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 49. [114]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > 50. file:///mc/compose?to=[115]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 51. [116]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > 52. file:///mc/compose?to=[117]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 53. file:///mc/compose?to=[118]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 54. [119]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> > 55. file:///mc/compose?to=[120]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 56. [121]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> > 57. file:///mc/compose?to=[122]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 58. [123]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> [124]Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [125]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>> References
>>
>> Visible links
>> 1. file:///mc/compose?to=pasik@xxxxxx
>> 2. file:///mc/compose?to=pasik@xxxxxx
>> 3. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 4. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 5. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 6. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 7. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 8. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 9. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 10. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 11. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 12. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 13. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 14. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 15. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 16. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 17. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 18. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 19. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 20. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 21. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 22. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 23. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 24. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 25. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 26. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 27. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 28. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 29. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 30. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 31. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 32. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 33. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 34. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 35. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 36. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 37. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 38. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 39. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 40. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 41. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 42. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 43. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 44. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 45. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 46. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 47. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 48. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 49. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 50. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 51. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 52. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 53. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 54. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 55. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 56. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 57. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 58. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 59. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 60. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 61. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 62. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 63. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 64. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 65. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 66. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 67. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 68. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 69. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 70. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 71. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 72. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 73. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 74. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 75. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 76. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 77. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 78. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 79. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 80. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 81. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 82. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 83. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 84. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 85. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 86. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 87. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 88. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 89. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 90. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 91. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 92. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 93. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 94. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 95. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 96. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 97. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 98. file:///mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> 99. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 100. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 101. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 102. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 103. file:///mc/compose?to=luis.silva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 104. file:///mc/compose?to=jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>> 105. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 106. file:///mc/compose?to=xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 107. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 108. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 109. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 110. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 111. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 112. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 113. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 114. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 115. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 116. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 117. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 118. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 119. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>> 120. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 121. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 122. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 123. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 124. file:///mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 125. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |