[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 17:13 +0100 schrieb Guillaume: > 2008/11/28 Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > 2008/11/28 Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: > >> > >> > Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 16:22 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink: > >> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a > >> > > > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage! > >> > > > >> > > My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the > >> > > links > >> > > 10GE -> 1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance. > >> > > >> > A GBit-Link has a maximum throughput of 110 MB/s and you really got > >> > about 100 MB/s? ;) > >> > >> NetApp is fast...Solaris too if it has enough disk;) > >> > >> > >> Stefan > Hey, i'd never thinking that my thread will bring so much ppl !! :D > > And about phy:// and disk:// :) which one is the best ? phy! > (was original > question :] not SAN, FC and other ! but interresting) ;) > > > > -- > Guillaume Thomas _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |