Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance

[Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/11/28 Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> 2008/11/28 Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:
>>
>> > Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 16:22 +0100 schrieb Stefan de Konink:
>> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a
>> > > > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage!
>> > >
>> > > My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links
>> > > 10GE ->  1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance.
>> >
>> > A GBit-Link has a maximum throughput of 110 MB/s and you really got
>> > about 100 MB/s? ;)
>>
>> NetApp is fast...Solaris too if it has enough disk;)
>>
>>
>> Stefan
Hey, i'd never thinking that my thread will bring so much ppl !!

 And about phy:// and disk:// :) which one is the best ? (was original
question :] not SAN, FC and other ! but interresting)



--
Guillaume

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users