Re: [Xen-users] multiple vif's/bridges

[andrew mathes <amathes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ok, so, ... brctl show shows this:

xen-br0         8000.001143fd7101       no              eth0
                                                        vif10.0
                                                        vif11.0
                                                        vif12.0
                                                        vif9.0
xen-br1         8000.001143fd7102       no              eth3
                                                        vif10.1
                                                        vif11.1
                                                        vif12.1
                                                        vif9.1

so obviously the interfaces are bound to the correct bridges, i just can't 
reach any of the interfaces through the second bridge (eth0 isn't plugged 
in ...)
I know eth0 worked when it was plugged in ... so maybe there's a different 
issue here?  i know eth3 works, i ssh in to it and it can get out ... 
don't know where to go from here ...
any suggestions?

On Mon, 2 May 2005, andrew mathes wrote:

> everyone has been very helpful so far, thank you all, hopefully i will become 
> knowledgeable enough to help out others.
> However ... if I use the below, it DOES set up two vif's with the correct 
> addresses, however, they can't reach/be reached by the internet.  (Only eth3 
> (of dom0)->xen-br1 is external available, so it seems to me they aren't 
> binding to br1, but to br0.
> My reason for thinking this is 1) the no external availability and 2) in the 
> dom0 ifconfig the vif.1 has the same MAC as br0, leading me to believe it's 
> bound to that MAC.
> Mark wrote:
> "The MAC of xenU's eth0, eth1 etc. The MAC of vifX.Y in dom0 always shows
> fe:ff:ff:ff:ff."
>
> is this true?  It seems vifX.1 (bound to br1) should have MAC of br1, vifX.0 
> bound to br0 should have MAC of br0.  Maybe this is where I'm going wrong.
> Everything worked fine when i was using eth0/br0 as my external interface ... 
> so i feel like the bridge binding is my only problem ...
> ugh, sorry I'm having so many problems ...
>
> On Mon, 2 May 2005, Jody Belka wrote:
>
> >  On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:45:22PM -0700, andrew mathes wrote:
> > >  i have this in my configuration file:
> > >  vif = [ 'mac=aa:00:00:1a:%d:11' % (vmid), 'bridge=xen-br0']
> > >  vif = [ 'mac=aa:00:00:1a:%d:12' % (vmid), 'bridge=xen-br1']
> >
> >  the configuration files are actually python scripts, so the
> >  2nd line there is replacing the information from the first. This is
> >  what you actually need:
> >
> >  vif = [ 'mac=aa:00:00:1a:%d:11, bridge=xen-br0' % (vmid),
> >         'mac=aa:00:00:1a:%d:12, bridge=xen-br1' % (vmid)]
> >
> >
> >  J
> >
> >  -- 
> >  Jody Belka
> >  knew (at) pimb (dot) org
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Xen-users mailing list
> >  Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users