[Xen-merge] Re: synch_bitops.h

[Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 06.01.06 15:05:12
> >>>
> >On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:28:33PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> I realize that it was your preference to not split the i386 and
> x86-64
> >> variants, as I had suggested with my patch. However, in course of
> >> undoing that patch the bug fixes got dropped, too. Was that
> >> intentional?
> >
> >I dropped the changes where instead of using =m, you suggested using
> +m.
> >The original Linux' bitops.h uses =m and using +m doesn't really make
> >a difference in this case.
> 
> As far as I know, there actually is a patch in Andi's queue to change
> that. I just thought it would be best to incorporate this correction now
> instead of waiting for (and then perhaps forgetting about) the mainline
> change.

Yeah, in that case it makes sense.

    christian


_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge