[Xen-merge] Re: synch_bitops.h

[Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:28:33PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I realize that it was your preference to not split the i386 and x86-64
> variants, as I had suggested with my patch. However, in course of
> undoing that patch the bug fixes got dropped, too. Was that
> intentional?

I dropped the changes where instead of using =m, you suggested using +m.
The original Linux' bitops.h uses =m and using +m doesn't really make
a difference in this case.

    christian


_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge