Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] necessary of `handling regNaT fault' message

[Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 03:43:18PM +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
> I'm not sure that the check is required, though, I think that the 
> message is noisy.  So, I make a proposal that replaces the printk() 
> by gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, ...).  What do you think?

Sounds reasonable.
But looking around faults.c, many printk()'s without XENLOG_xxx
are used. Perhaps it's good time to clean up all of them.


> 
> Best regards,
>  Kan
> 
> Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:21:34 +0900 (JST), "KUWAMURA Shin'ya" wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Running i386 version LMbench on IA32-EL of dom0 generates many
> >message outputs: # tens of lines per a second
> >  (XEN) ia64_handle_reflection: handling regNaT fault
> >
> >Is the check required?
> >
> >I attached the patch that remove printk().
> >
> >How to reproduce:
> >1. build LMbench on an i386 machine
> >2. run par_mem on ia64
> >   cd <LMbench directory>/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu
> >   ./par_mem -L 128 -M 16M
> >
> >Best Regards,
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 

-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel