[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH] compilation fix of ia64 hypervisor.c, utils.c (was Re:[Xen-ia64-devel] latest tree building fail.)


  • To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:57:55 +0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:58:11 -0700
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcZ0ThEzA8XRk8huSUCtHBJGSa6w9AATxUwg
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH] compilation fix of ia64 hypervisor.c, utils.c (was Re:[Xen-ia64-devel] latest tree building fail.)

>From: Alex Williamson
>Sent: 2006年5月11日 0:23
>
>> - Does xen reboot after the above messages or just be silent?
>>   It seems that something occurs somewhere in acpi_boot_init() of
>>   linux/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c.
>>   Could you track it down more?
>
>   It MCAs at this point.  The error record indicates a bus error w/
>target ID 0x0000001804108804.  The chipset reports a response
>timeout
>with this same address.  The bad memory reference seems to have
>come
>from iosapic_guest_write(), but as indicated by the bad lapic address
>above, the problem appears to have started earlier.  I'll investigate
>further.  Thanks,
>
>       Alex
>

I met a similar error when debugging patch for moving iosapic previously:
ACPI: Error parsing MADT - no IOSAPIC entries

The reason at that time was because xen and xenlinux had different 
NR_IOSAPICS definition. Xenlinux defaulted to 256 while xen limited to 4. 
On my tiger4 box, there's 6 IOSAPICS however. Then xen only initialized 
4 IOSAPIC related structures, while xenlinux saw all 6 IOSAPICs. Finally 
when xenlinux operated 5th IOSAPIC, MCA happens. However the 
difference is, MCA occurred to me at MPT SCSI controller initialization, 
instead of immediately after above ACPI error message.

Since above error has been solved, yours should be a bit different which 
may relate to bogus mapping. How can people reproduce your error? Or 
maybe debug can be postponed if current dom0 on VP is not full ready?

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.