[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: ia64_new_rr7 rewritten + cleanup


  • To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:59:01 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:59:12 -0700
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcZzf7tIQoQRhtV0RTSeTp4WCogVMAAASfvA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: ia64_new_rr7 rewritten + cleanup

> > Good cleanup.  No specific problems noted however something
> > this basic should probably get more thorough testing.  Since
> > rr7 changes only on domain switch, booting a few domains
> > simultaneously and actively exercising them would probably
> > be a good idea.
> Sure.
> But a single error and the domain doesn't boot anymore.

Perhaps.  For example, if dom0 and domU are identical bits,
if rr7 never changed (due to a bug), everything might still
boot and work properly.  (Maybe not, but there may be other
similar examples.)
 
> Booting dom0+domU each 2 ways on a 2 cpus machine does also a 
> lot of domain 
> switch.  I will exerce this night.

Thanks.  I trust your patches very much, but now that
everything is finally stable, I think we should be
testing patches to core function with more than just
a boot domU test.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.