|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] xen/riscv: introduce struct arch_vcpu
On 02.02.2026 13:57, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/domain.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,55 @@ struct arch_vcpu_io {
>
> struct arch_vcpu {
> struct vcpu_vmid vmid;
Nit: This being already here contradicts the title saying "introduce".
> +
> + /*
> + * Callee saved registers for Xen's state used to switch from
> + * prev's stack to the next's stack during context switch.
> + */
> + struct
> + {
> + register_t s0;
> + register_t s1;
> + register_t s2;
> + register_t s3;
> + register_t s4;
> + register_t s5;
> + register_t s6;
> + register_t s7;
> + register_t s8;
> + register_t s9;
> + register_t s10;
> + register_t s11;
> + register_t sp;
> + register_t ra;
> + } xen_saved_context;
> +
> + register_t hedeleg;
> + register_t hideleg;
> + register_t hvip;
> + register_t hip;
> + register_t hie;
> + register_t hgeie;
> + register_t henvcfg;
> + register_t hcounteren;
> + register_t htimedelta;
> + register_t htval;
> + register_t htinst;
> + register_t hstateen0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_32
> + register_t henvcfgh;
> + register_t htimedeltah;
> +#endif
When you add these right away, any reason other high-half registers aren't added
as well? HVIP (above) and VSIE / VSIP at the very least have such counterparts,
iirc.
> + register_t vsstatus;
> + register_t vsip;
> + register_t vsie;
> + register_t vstvec;
> + register_t vsscratch;
> + register_t vscause;
> + register_t vstval;
> + register_t vsatp;
> + register_t vsepc;
> };
What I'm generally concerned of: With the registers all being put here in one
go,
without any of them actually being used in this patch, it'll likely be harder to
track that they're saved / restored / initialized correctly (once uses appear).
Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |