[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] x86/intel: Resync intel-family.h
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:44:22 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=9s9ydKkgVoCIdlRXbpEUY7dHNLoTCOWwZ3cXCoDh7b8=; b=Y3YqDJt6ClTxbY6PnC4fgae/4jqDM7KnVszH9Wi1eROmNDCvMaIeeCtqpyM3svKC2WixuGVYsjRW69oEFJd4PuLx90CtmGpGIENeuv4mT/YwmqG8EqW0zm1d/Y/SMHA0U9MXuC3/B6xT5lZ1wA8qX9CdRdjfspdUhReEPJml+tiE//rDE9t9mU2XrVVG6BJg3omlj6pO+XiRNtoM/5rDWRmrpl0ZMxYgDAaYwSlIYvGmZoAfDf/Az+0FHPPBJo6SRN0Riwh10WRAAddiPuSk6bOwoVoA8ZLQ4mNUwgFN0ZrcFdcV5FEeaLu1iGDs37Kb1SeuYfngCCjkselwNWl/eg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lgzi1ARaXN97f61rtrFpOzQon/9hCrfyc4q+9wk4COSt0M80w5InyK0/xq+uIZtcphSMvPZxXZbS3gKixRXMfLmzZ4CekgEdzvY5V4CEGtDAET0YCwf5oN/NrK/2CRnKsDMqBl+/jm89YEHdC/wUT9QVVt2feCVoU6HNlakzyRNKtd/IretWW5bmDhObDJyw2hhdUysoXxQIqBAP+XeitFrL1JaktKwCeCssAgM2bUodb4nbtC5IZ+iZw7kq1xuqodrJIcUPOH/CQnBYQ8ITc6FZhqmCJIcBaQcOep2g9d6TUeptJfuq81FW0R/229d9dhYfUZ+dPD4dy0ZTlp8Wmg==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Lampis <kevin.lampis@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:44:38 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 24/11/2025 3:17 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.11.2025 16:08, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks.
>
>> I'm unsure about the Intel CPU Core types, but it's probably better to keep
>> them than strip them from our copy.
> Did you mean "pre-Core" here? In any event, as we're meaning to stay in sync,
> we can as well do so properly.
No, I mean the enum's at the bottom.
>
>> @@ -152,9 +174,9 @@
>> #define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT IFM(6, 0x37) /* Bay Trail,
>> Valleyview */
>> #define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_D IFM(6, 0x4D) /* Avaton, Rangely
>> */
>> #define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID IFM(6, 0x4A) /* Merriefield */
>> +#define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID2 IFM(6, 0x5A) /* Anniedale */
>>
>> #define INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT IFM(6, 0x4C) /* Cherry Trail, Braswell
>> */
>> -#define INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT_MID IFM(6, 0x5A) /* Moorefield */
> Interesting, there's one entry changing the group it belongs to. We don't
> use the constant anywhere, so right now this is purely a cosmetic change.
Christian did some archaeology, and concluded that it was misclassified
originally.
~Andrew
|
