Re: [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as an AMD SVM & IOMMU reviewer

[Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/9/25 2:36 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:

> On 08.10.2025 22:11, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -220,6 +220,23 @@ F:	xen/drivers/acpi/
> >  F:	xen/include/acpi/
> >  F:	tools/libacpi/
> >  
> > +AMD IOMMU
> > +M:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > +M:	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +M:	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +R:	Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>
> > +S:	Supported
> > +F:	xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
> > +
> > +AMD SVM
> > +M:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > +M:	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +M:	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +R:	Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>
> > +S:	Supported
> > +F:	xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/
> > +F:	xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
> >       
> What about xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/svm/ ? It didn't need specific
> mentioning on the X86 entry, but it would now. Also F: entries generally
> want sorting alphabetically as well.
>
> > @@ -601,7 +618,8 @@ M:	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >  S:	Supported
> >  L:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >  F:	xen/arch/x86/
> > -F:	xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/
> > +X:	xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/
> > +X:	xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
> >       
> Didn't the v1 discussion result in there being no need for these X:
> entries?
>
> As long as there's agreement, I'd be happy to make adjustments while
> committing. Oleksii - I take it that ./MAINTAINERS changes can still go
> in pretty freely?
>     
Yes, you are right. Feel free to commit such changes without R-Acked-by.

~ Oleksii