[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH] misra: update list of GCC extensions used by Xen
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:27:25 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; bugseng.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=162.55.131.47
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; d=bugseng.com; s=openarc; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1745479645; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:X-Sender:Organization:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=5rtpMavMXXIb5oM6UX+ySi3Lo/7Is8wEMtUJa1KoLg8=; b=UobhDhLjX2JVIqnAbSqUGrXNZ6CDneU9LOo//rSXpSLL/2gCm2y4nbJq1ogc+CS6j2Mx G+xftEJRmenJuw8qq1/H8uZ+Ne6iJqfsYtY7Gq/eKyiiKuvoRk/JylERsfo9ZE5kbqH9g kzSVewTGBEUYUih7RpUK+e1NrZsB6Ja5rhNn+tBDwQkOaCd4FBYfCemag0vKRiFH32KQN n8bkNkWtUU388d2kUvladYpcguBBjgrgKw63GY0O0UD1KCEvfOsgIfVewZ64HB3Oj70n3 9xCmqpFoTd48IY8fSF9fRnd+eSk/CBrxfo1B1eR2PChFXc0dvLHU6HgVupHiS9lXroV5W b5TTo91V3umXPmpDXT87yWGOkspnpD8En7Rl/Z2cw0xq0kNZ8dnj1KBwScoZnN/TYlitp lSXgDLMHA9tJ2tZDDhygkrg34Q1l9upGxgfD8C0fB7QDNkpD4fK4n0hIPlSsdZAnmZkgQ +Prslr/yq0ZRAgQenFb6OAreLeEsYgzoFYNpIovCZ/gIubMETcxvHYfxLjUlOL/AOzDwc f2ZWArjOsLlspq7K+Z25SE2HjBK4EQ1c847j2wnbtPNR9cJdoHy5m7iA7O4yWUQ9ZzCeA vOBzzuNjTJWgkh1+DvO8qDRjyqxUWUUGOVO3fYVYNlSnhQTA/3umpzRvgFzXa2k=
- Arc-seal: i=1; d=bugseng.com; s=openarc; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1745479645; b=Pg2CcLUBQJrK+UcxRXtU3pH9q8GMpkOZyIjurKiFzhvMs8lDFIUf/9buRvOhf9JPxvL6 T3Z8tgHbgdZ6InCrKFIssnWmINOrlTEhV3NcKfBOCkC3nIlV9chmYmek/eMD1LViTZFIe esGt9D4zW/80fm6AI8m6C16EfwAzggnQR322sS9PpM8CArHFET5Ki0afgRkYeXJvAxzi5 qvlSwEYn55t+NaYbk7++3PtrHodC08yL/i2mr12svDyHtvryVQQMy/ZPaV1WoRQ8u9go/ A+k3sLQlq/Gp6w0I/s7JhWcdhDezs21hsbjgOPP7JlLA20jh1Pv9MGu2Yo5JoQJ9C7byV 3IHFqz37NNwwtXxu4Uczzjnv+8Dt42N0ZiycBq3zXoRr/cf7wk/QGFQ6Fg4y/E5kkPkIz 9r4SEWpRKIKX7itQzQbV//dC5Swh3zahMqxZmkFPlsT3bCxz/2UlTel0tD5UpsDJ5gaDa qY5yR1UuHkxyeD+S2cpIVKvGvFOQbqjWz8FWCh6zbrsLB2nbvztr+IrV2KTEDISlp+qx6 NBLFNL9PyAnRtntrByUb4ouT/kyGhshAMy94CiFPg0lPCTzjigYWvSD6l6UZp0CQoewcu OprS5eP8iZouLRrExrsQyW4Jz4dXV6jV32Nwqjbc50YeyYVhbyOWbfBg4R3dtPg=
- Authentication-results: bugseng.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=162.55.131.47
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:27:37 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 2025-04-24 00:46, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 23/04/2025 9:55 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
__inline was not mentioned in C-language-toolchain.rst, while
__inline__ is not used in code under xen/. __inline is kept because
it
may be used in Xen. The ECLAIR configuration is now consistent with
the
documented extensions in the rst file.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hmm. f96e2f64576cd
I take it that patch shouldn't have gone in then?
Regardless, now that we're putting it back in, we should put in both
__inline and __inline__, so as not to need to come back and repeat this
patch again.
~Andrew
Did I miss the addition of __inline__ here?
https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20250422113957.1289290-1-andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx/
No issue with adjusting it as you wrote, but my understanding was that
only __inline will reenter the codebase.
--
Nicola Vetrini, B.Sc.
Software Engineer
BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicola-vetrini-a42471253
|
