[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH] x86emul: adjust BSF/BSR behavior as to EFLAGS
SDM revision 087 points out that apparently as of quite some time ago on Intel hardware BSF and BSR may alter all arithmetic flags, not just ZF. Because of the inconsistency (and because documentation doesn't look to be quite right about PF), best we can do is simply take the flag values from what the processor produces, just like we do for various other arithmetic insns. (Note also that AMD and Intel have always been disagreeing on arithmetic flags other than ZF.) Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- Since I happened to look at it, I wonder whether for e.g. SHLD/SHRD we wouldn't be better off using _emulate_2op_SrcV_nobyte() as well; we already do so in x86_emul_rmw(), after all. --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c @@ -5268,16 +5268,14 @@ x86_emulate( break; case X86EMUL_OPC(0x0f, 0xbc): /* bsf or tzcnt */ - { - bool zf; - - asm ( "bsf %2,%0" ASM_FLAG_OUT(, "; setz %1") - : "=r" (dst.val), ASM_FLAG_OUT("=@ccz", "=qm") (zf) - : "rm" (src.val) ); - _regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_ZF; if ( (vex.pfx == vex_f3) && vcpu_has_bmi1() ) { - _regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_CF; + bool zf; + + asm ( "bsf %2,%0" ASM_FLAG_OUT(, "; setz %1") + : "=r" (dst.val), ASM_FLAG_OUT("=@ccz", "=qm") (zf) + : "rm" (src.val) ); + _regs.eflags &= ~(X86_EFLAGS_ZF | X86_EFLAGS_CF); if ( zf ) { _regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_CF; @@ -5286,25 +5284,23 @@ x86_emulate( else if ( !dst.val ) _regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_ZF; } - else if ( zf ) + else { - _regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_ZF; - dst.type = OP_NONE; + emulate_2op_SrcV_srcmem("bsf", src, dst, _regs.eflags); + if ( _regs.eflags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF ) + dst.type = OP_NONE; } break; - } case X86EMUL_OPC(0x0f, 0xbd): /* bsr or lzcnt */ - { - bool zf; - - asm ( "bsr %2,%0" ASM_FLAG_OUT(, "; setz %1") - : "=r" (dst.val), ASM_FLAG_OUT("=@ccz", "=qm") (zf) - : "rm" (src.val) ); - _regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_ZF; if ( (vex.pfx == vex_f3) && vcpu_has_lzcnt() ) { - _regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_CF; + bool zf; + + asm ( "bsr %2,%0" ASM_FLAG_OUT(, "; setz %1") + : "=r" (dst.val), ASM_FLAG_OUT("=@ccz", "=qm") (zf) + : "rm" (src.val) ); + _regs.eflags &= ~(X86_EFLAGS_ZF | X86_EFLAGS_CF); if ( zf ) { _regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_CF; @@ -5317,13 +5313,13 @@ x86_emulate( _regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_ZF; } } - else if ( zf ) + else { - _regs.eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_ZF; - dst.type = OP_NONE; + emulate_2op_SrcV_srcmem("bsr", src, dst, _regs.eflags); + if ( _regs.eflags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF ) + dst.type = OP_NONE; } break; - } case X86EMUL_OPC(0x0f, 0xbe): /* movsx rm8,r{16,32,64} */ /* Recompute DstReg as we may have decoded AH/BH/CH/DH. */
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |