[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] xen: introduce Kconfig ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL
On 20/03/2025 08:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > On 19.03.2025 17:31, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >> >> On 3/19/25 12:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 18.03.2025 14:05, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>>> On 3/17/25 9:07 PM, Luca Fancellu wrote: >>>>> From: Penny Zheng<Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> ARM MPU system doesn't need to use paging memory pool, as MPU memory >>>>> mapping table at most takes only one 4KB page, which is enough to >>>>> manage the maximum 255 MPU memory regions, for all EL2 stage 1 >>>>> translation and EL1 stage 2 translation. >>>>> >>>>> Introduce ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL Kconfig common symbol, selected for Arm >>>>> MMU systems, x86 and RISC-V. >>>>> >>>>> Wrap the code inside 'construct_domU' that deal with p2m paging >>>>> allocation in a new function 'domain_p2m_set_allocation', protected >>>>> by ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL, this is done in this way to prevent polluting >>>>> the former function with #ifdefs and improve readability >>>>> >>>>> Introduce arch_{get,set}_paging_mempool_size stubs for architecture >>>>> with !ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL. >>>>> >>>>> Remove 'struct paging_domain' from Arm 'struct arch_domain' when the >>>>> field is not required. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng<penny.zheng@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Chen<wei.chen@xxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu<luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> v3 changes: >>>>> - Introduced ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL instead of HAS_PAGING_MEMPOOL >>>>> v2 changes: >>>>> - make Kconfig HAS_PAGING_MEMPOOL common >>>>> - protect also "xen,domain-p2m-mem-mb" reading with HAS_PAGING_MEMPOOL >>>>> - do not define p2m_teardown{_allocation} in this patch >>>>> - change commit message >>>>> --- >>>>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + >>>>> xen/arch/arm/dom0less-build.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>>>> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h | 2 + >>>>> xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + >>>>> xen/arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + >>>>> xen/common/Kconfig | 3 ++ >>>>> xen/include/xen/domain.h | 17 +++++++ >>>>> 7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >>>> For RISC-V: >>>> Reviewed-by: Oleksii Kurochko<oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Mind me asking then why RISC-V needs this at this point? The stubs surely >>> were added to address some build issue, not because they are actively >>> meaningful? >> >> Only because we have stubs and not to have redefinition compilation >> error. And, yes, they are not actively meaningful now, at least. I am >> okay with not enabling of this config for RISC-V but then seems to me we >> have to drop stubs in riscv/stubs.c. ~ Oleksii > > Well, I don't think it's "have to", but I agree that dropping them would > make sense then (and be desirable). @Jan, @Oleksii, is there anything blocking this patch to be committed (Luca question does not seem to be answered)? Other patches in the series are ready to be merged. ~Michal
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |