[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] xen/arm: ffa: Introduce VM to VM support
Hi Jens, > On 24 Mar 2025, at 11:24, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:15 AM Bertrand Marquis > <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Create a CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM parameter to activate FFA communication >> between VMs. >> When activated list VMs in the system with FF-A support in part_info_get. >> >> When VM to VM is activated, Xen will be tainted as Insecure and a >> message is displayed to the user during the boot as there is no >> filtering of VMs in FF-A so any VM can communicate or see any other VM >> in the system. >> >> WARNING: There is no filtering for now and all VMs are listed !! >> >> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> Changes in v3: >> - break partinfo_get in several sub functions to make the implementation >> easier to understand and lock handling easier >> - rework implementation to check size along the way and prevent previous >> implementation limits which had to check that the number of VMs or SPs >> did not change >> - taint Xen as INSECURE when VM to VM is enabled >> Changes in v2: >> - Switch ifdef to IS_ENABLED >> - dom was not switched to d as requested by Jan because there is already >> a variable d pointing to the current domain and it must not be >> shadowed. >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig | 11 ++ >> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c | 12 ++ >> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c | 270 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h | 12 ++ >> 4 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig >> index c5b0f88d7522..88a4c4c99154 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig >> @@ -28,5 +28,16 @@ config FFA >> >> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0077/latest >> >> +config FFA_VM_TO_VM >> + bool "Enable FF-A between VMs (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED >> + default n >> + depends on FFA >> + help >> + This option enables to use FF-A between VMs. >> + This is experimental and there is no access control so any >> + guest can communicate with any other guest. >> + >> + If unsure, say N. >> + >> endmenu >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c >> index 3bbdd7168a6b..e41ab5f8ada6 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c >> @@ -464,6 +464,18 @@ static bool ffa_probe(void) >> printk(XENLOG_INFO "ARM FF-A Mediator version %u.%u\n", >> FFA_MY_VERSION_MAJOR, FFA_MY_VERSION_MINOR); >> >> + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) ) >> + { >> + /* >> + * When FFA VM to VM is enabled, the current implementation does not >> + * offer any way to limit which VM can communicate with which VM >> using >> + * FF-A. >> + * Signal this in the xen console and taint the system as insecure. >> + * TODO: Introduce a solution to limit what a VM can do through FFA. >> + */ >> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: VM to VM is enabled, system is insecure >> !!\n"); >> + add_taint(TAINT_MACHINE_INSECURE); >> + } >> /* >> * psci_init_smccc() updates this value with what's reported by EL-3 >> * or secure world. >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c >> b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c >> index c0510ceb8338..93847b36cf2f 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_partinfo.c >> @@ -63,9 +63,152 @@ static int32_t ffa_partition_info_get(uint32_t *uuid, >> uint32_t flags, >> return ret; >> } >> >> -void ffa_handle_partition_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) >> +static int32_t ffa_get_sp_count(uint32_t *uuid, uint32_t *sp_count) >> +{ >> + uint32_t src_size; >> + >> + return ffa_partition_info_get(uuid, FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT_FLAG, >> + sp_count, &src_size); >> +} >> + >> +static int32_t ffa_get_sp_partinfo(uint32_t *uuid, uint32_t *sp_count, >> + void *dst_buf, void *end_buf, >> + uint32_t dst_size) >> { >> int32_t ret; >> + uint32_t src_size, real_sp_count; >> + void *src_buf = ffa_rx; >> + >> + *sp_count = 0; >> + >> + /* Do we have a RX buffer with the SPMC */ >> + if ( !ffa_rx ) >> + return FFA_RET_DENIED; >> + >> + /* We need to use the RX buffer to receive the list */ >> + spin_lock(&ffa_rx_buffer_lock); >> + >> + ret = ffa_partition_info_get(uuid, 0, &real_sp_count, &src_size); >> + if ( ret ) >> + goto out; >> + >> + /* We now own the RX buffer */ >> + >> + /* We only support a 1.1 firmware version */ >> + if ( src_size != sizeof(struct ffa_partition_info_1_1) ) > > Before this change, we supported firmware version 1.0. It looks like > the code below should work with "src_size < sizeof(struct > ffa_partition_info_1_0)" as we had before. You are right this should not be here. v1.0 structure size should be ok, i will just need to memset to 0 the UUID part if destination size is bigger. I will fix that. > >> + { >> + ret = FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; >> + goto out_release; >> + } >> + >> + for ( uint32_t sp_num = 0; sp_num < real_sp_count; sp_num++ ) >> + { >> + struct ffa_partition_info_1_1 *fpi = src_buf; >> + >> + /* filter out SP not following bit 15 convention if any */ >> + if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(fpi->id) ) >> + { >> + if ( dst_buf + dst_size > end_buf ) >> + { >> + ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY; >> + goto out_release; >> + } >> + >> + memcpy(dst_buf, src_buf, dst_size); >> + dst_buf += dst_size; >> + *sp_count += 1; > > This is subtle and easily misunderstood. Normally you'd use the ++ > operator when incrementing by one, but that doesn't work as intended > unless written as (*sp_count)++. I prefer using a local variable and > updating *sp_count with a normal assignment when the loop is done. If > you agree, please update ffa_get_vm_partinfo() too since it has the > same pattern. This is why i did not use the ++ form. I will switch to a local variable if you think this is better. Cheers Bertrand > > Cheers, > Jens > >> + } >> + >> + src_buf += src_size; >> + } >> + >> +out_release: >> + ffa_hyp_rx_release(); >> +out: >> + spin_unlock(&ffa_rx_buffer_lock); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static uint32_t ffa_get_vm_count(void) >> +{ >> + struct domain *d = current->domain; >> + struct domain *dom; >> + uint32_t vm_count = 0; >> + >> + /* Count the number of VM with FF-A support */ >> + rcu_read_lock(&domlist_read_lock); >> + for_each_domain( dom ) >> + { >> + struct ffa_ctx *vm = dom->arch.tee; >> + >> + if (dom != d && vm != NULL && vm->guest_vers != 0) >> + vm_count++; >> + } >> + rcu_read_unlock(&domlist_read_lock); >> + >> + return vm_count; >> +} >> + >> +static int32_t ffa_get_vm_partinfo(uint32_t *vm_count, void *dst_buf, >> + void *end_buf, uint32_t dst_size) >> +{ >> + struct domain *d = current->domain; >> + struct domain *dom; >> + int32_t ret = FFA_RET_OK; >> + >> + *vm_count = 0; >> + >> + rcu_read_lock(&domlist_read_lock); >> + for_each_domain( dom ) >> + { >> + struct ffa_ctx *vm = dom->arch.tee; >> + >> + /* >> + * we do not add the VM calling to the list and only VMs with >> + * FF-A support >> + */ >> + if ( dom != d && vm != NULL && vm->guest_vers != 0 ) >> + { >> + /* >> + * We do not have UUID info for VMs so use >> + * the 1.0 structure so that we set UUIDs to >> + * zero using memset >> + */ >> + struct ffa_partition_info_1_0 srcvm; >> + >> + if ( dst_buf + dst_size > end_buf ) >> + { >> + ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + srcvm.id = ffa_get_vm_id(dom); >> + srcvm.execution_context = dom->max_vcpus; >> + srcvm.partition_properties = FFA_PART_VM_PROP; >> + if ( is_64bit_domain(dom) ) >> + srcvm.partition_properties |= FFA_PART_PROP_AARCH64_STATE; >> + >> + memcpy(dst_buf, &srcvm, MIN(sizeof(srcvm), dst_size)); >> + >> + if ( dst_size > sizeof(srcvm) ) >> + memset(dst_buf + sizeof(srcvm), 0, >> + dst_size - sizeof(srcvm)); >> + >> + dst_buf += dst_size; >> + *vm_count += 1; >> + } >> + } >> + >> +out: >> + rcu_read_unlock(&domlist_read_lock); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> + >> +void ffa_handle_partition_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) >> +{ >> + int32_t ret = FFA_RET_OK; >> struct domain *d = current->domain; >> struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee; >> uint32_t flags = get_user_reg(regs, 5); >> @@ -75,9 +218,9 @@ void ffa_handle_partition_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs >> *regs) >> get_user_reg(regs, 3), >> get_user_reg(regs, 4), >> }; >> - uint32_t src_size, dst_size; >> - void *dst_buf; >> - uint32_t ffa_sp_count = 0; >> + uint32_t dst_size = 0; >> + void *dst_buf, *end_buf; >> + uint32_t ffa_vm_count = 0, ffa_sp_count = 0; >> >> /* >> * If the guest is v1.0, he does not get back the entry size so we must >> @@ -89,118 +232,63 @@ void ffa_handle_partition_info_get(struct >> cpu_user_regs *regs) >> else >> dst_size = sizeof(struct ffa_partition_info_1_1); >> >> - /* >> - * FF-A v1.0 has w5 MBZ while v1.1 allows >> - * FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT_FLAG to be non-zero. >> - * >> - * FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT is only using registers and not the >> - * rxtx buffer so do the partition_info_get directly. >> - */ >> - if ( flags == FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT_FLAG && >> - ctx->guest_vers == FFA_VERSION_1_1 ) >> + /* Only count requested */ >> + if ( flags ) >> { >> + /* >> + * FF-A v1.0 has w5 MBZ while v1.1 allows >> + * FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT_FLAG to be non-zero. >> + */ >> + if ( ctx->guest_vers == FFA_VERSION_1_0 || >> + flags != FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT_FLAG ) >> + { >> + ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> if ( ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET) ) >> - ret = ffa_partition_info_get(uuid, flags, &ffa_sp_count, >> - &src_size); >> - else >> - ret = FFA_RET_OK; >> + { >> + ret = ffa_get_sp_count(uuid, &ffa_sp_count); >> + if ( ret ) >> + goto out; >> + } >> >> - goto out; >> - } >> + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) ) >> + ffa_vm_count = ffa_get_vm_count(); >> >> - if ( flags ) >> - { >> - ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS; >> - goto out; >> - } >> - >> - if ( !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET) ) >> - { >> - /* Just give an empty partition list to the caller */ >> - ret = FFA_RET_OK; >> goto out; >> } >> >> + /* Get the RX buffer to write the list of partitions */ >> ret = ffa_rx_acquire(d); >> if ( ret != FFA_RET_OK ) >> goto out; >> >> dst_buf = ctx->rx; >> + end_buf = ctx->rx + ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE; >> >> - if ( !ffa_rx ) >> + if ( ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET) ) >> { >> - ret = FFA_RET_DENIED; >> - goto out_rx_release; >> - } >> - >> - spin_lock(&ffa_rx_buffer_lock); >> - >> - ret = ffa_partition_info_get(uuid, 0, &ffa_sp_count, &src_size); >> + ret = ffa_get_sp_partinfo(uuid, &ffa_sp_count, dst_buf, end_buf, >> + dst_size); >> >> - if ( ret ) >> - goto out_rx_hyp_unlock; >> + if ( ret ) >> + goto out_rx_release; >> >> - /* >> - * ffa_partition_info_get() succeeded so we now own the RX buffer we >> - * share with the SPMC. We must give it back using ffa_hyp_rx_release() >> - * once we've copied the content. >> - */ >> - >> - /* we cannot have a size smaller than 1.0 structure */ >> - if ( src_size < sizeof(struct ffa_partition_info_1_0) ) >> - { >> - ret = FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; >> - goto out_rx_hyp_release; >> - } >> - >> - if ( ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE < ffa_sp_count * dst_size ) >> - { >> - ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY; >> - goto out_rx_hyp_release; >> + dst_buf += ffa_sp_count * dst_size; >> } >> >> - if ( ffa_sp_count > 0 ) >> - { >> - uint32_t n, n_limit = ffa_sp_count; >> - void *src_buf = ffa_rx; >> - >> - /* copy the secure partitions info */ >> - for ( n = 0; n < n_limit; n++ ) >> - { >> - struct ffa_partition_info_1_1 *fpi = src_buf; >> - >> - /* filter out SP not following bit 15 convention if any */ >> - if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(fpi->id) ) >> - { >> - memcpy(dst_buf, src_buf, dst_size); >> - dst_buf += dst_size; >> - } >> - else >> - ffa_sp_count--; >> + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) ) >> + ret = ffa_get_vm_partinfo(&ffa_vm_count, dst_buf, end_buf, >> dst_size); >> >> - src_buf += src_size; >> - } >> - } >> - >> -out_rx_hyp_release: >> - ffa_hyp_rx_release(); >> -out_rx_hyp_unlock: >> - spin_unlock(&ffa_rx_buffer_lock); >> out_rx_release: >> - /* >> - * The calling VM RX buffer only contains data to be used by the VM if >> the >> - * call was successful, in which case the VM has to release the buffer >> - * once it has used the data. >> - * If something went wrong during the call, we have to release the RX >> - * buffer back to the SPMC as the VM will not do it. >> - */ >> - if ( ret != FFA_RET_OK ) >> + if ( ret ) >> ffa_rx_release(d); >> out: >> if ( ret ) >> ffa_set_regs_error(regs, ret); >> else >> - ffa_set_regs_success(regs, ffa_sp_count, dst_size); >> + ffa_set_regs_success(regs, ffa_sp_count + ffa_vm_count, dst_size); >> } >> >> static int32_t ffa_direct_req_send_vm(uint16_t sp_id, uint16_t vm_id, >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h >> index c4cd65538908..bd6877d8c632 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h >> @@ -187,6 +187,18 @@ >> */ >> #define FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET_COUNT_FLAG BIT(0, U) >> >> +/* >> + * Partition properties we give for a normal world VM: >> + * - can send direct message but not receive them >> + * - can handle indirect messages >> + * - can receive notifications >> + * 32/64 bit flag is set depending on the VM >> + */ >> +#define FFA_PART_VM_PROP (FFA_PART_PROP_DIRECT_REQ_SEND | \ >> + FFA_PART_PROP_INDIRECT_MSGS | \ >> + FFA_PART_PROP_RECV_NOTIF | \ >> + FFA_PART_PROP_IS_PE_ID) >> + >> /* Flags used in calls to FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET interface */ >> #define FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SP BIT(0, U) >> #define FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_VM BIT(1, U) >> -- >> 2.47.1
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |