[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] xen/arm: ffa: Add buffer full notification support
Hi Bertrand, On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:15 AM Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add support to raise a Rx buffer full notification to a VM. > This function will be used for indirect message support between VM and > is only activated if CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM is selected. > > Even if there are 32 framework notifications possible, right now only > one is defined so the implementation is simplified to only handle the > buffer full notification using a boolean. If other framework > notifications have to be supported one day, the design will have to be > modified to handle it properly. > > Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v3: > - introduce a vm_pending boolean to track if VM notifications are > pending and allow to decorelate pending secure notifications from > pending vm ones > - remove ifdef around boolean entries for notifications and make use of > IS_ENABLED instead of ifdefs when possible > - Fix notification number signaled to VMs for buffer full to use the > proper GUEST_FFA_NOTIF_PEND_INTR_ID instead of the identifier received > from the SPMC. > - Move back into this patch ffa_private.h part which was wrongly in the > patch for indirect messages between VM > Changes in v2: > - Switch ifdef to IS_ENABLED when possible > --- > xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Jens > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c > index 00efaf8f7353..f6df2f15bb00 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > { > struct domain *d = current->domain; > struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee; > + bool notif_pending; > > if ( !notif_enabled ) > { > @@ -76,7 +77,11 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > return; > } > > - if ( test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.secure_pending) ) > + notif_pending = test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.secure_pending); > + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) ) > + notif_pending |= test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.vm_pending); > + > + if ( notif_pending ) > { > /* A pending global notification for the guest */ > ffa_set_regs(regs, FFA_SUCCESS_64, 0, > @@ -93,6 +98,7 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > { > struct domain *d = current->domain; > + struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee; > uint32_t recv = get_user_reg(regs, 1); > uint32_t flags = get_user_reg(regs, 2); > uint32_t w2 = 0; > @@ -132,11 +138,7 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > */ > if ( ( flags & FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SP ) && > ( flags & FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SPM ) ) > - { > - struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee; > - > - ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->notif.secure_pending) = false; > - } > + ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->notif.secure_pending) = false; > > arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&arg, &resp); > e = ffa_get_ret_code(&resp); > @@ -156,6 +158,14 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > w6 = resp.a6; > } > > + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) && > + flags & FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_HYP && > + test_and_clear_bool(ctx->notif.buff_full_pending) ) > + { > + ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->notif.vm_pending) = false; > + w7 = FFA_NOTIF_RX_BUFFER_FULL; > + } > + > ffa_set_regs(regs, FFA_SUCCESS_32, 0, w2, w3, w4, w5, w6, w7); > } > > @@ -178,6 +188,20 @@ int ffa_handle_notification_set(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > bitmap_hi); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM > +void ffa_raise_rx_buffer_full(struct domain *d) > +{ > + struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee; > + > + if ( !ctx ) > + return; > + > + ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->notif.buff_full_pending) = true; > + if ( !test_and_set_bool(ctx->notif.vm_pending) ) > + vgic_inject_irq(d, d->vcpu[0], GUEST_FFA_NOTIF_PEND_INTR_ID, true); > +} > +#endif > + > /* > * Extract a 16-bit ID (index n) from the successful return value from > * FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET_64 or FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET_32. IDs are > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h > index bd6877d8c632..878af2d76e0e 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_private.h > @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ > #define FFA_NOTIF_INFO_GET_ID_COUNT_SHIFT 7 > #define FFA_NOTIF_INFO_GET_ID_COUNT_MASK 0x1F > > +#define FFA_NOTIF_RX_BUFFER_FULL BIT(0, U) > + > /* Feature IDs used with FFA_FEATURES */ > #define FFA_FEATURE_NOTIF_PEND_INTR 0x1U > #define FFA_FEATURE_SCHEDULE_RECV_INTR 0x2U > @@ -295,9 +297,20 @@ struct ffa_mem_region { > struct ffa_ctx_notif { > /* > * True if domain is reported by FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET to have > - * pending global notifications. > + * pending notifications from the secure world. > */ > bool secure_pending; > + > + /* > + * True if domain is reported by FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET to have > + * pending notifications from VMs (including framework ones). > + */ > + bool vm_pending; > + > + /* > + * True if domain has buffer full notification pending > + */ > + bool buff_full_pending; > }; > > struct ffa_ctx { > @@ -369,6 +382,14 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_info_get(struct > cpu_user_regs *regs); > void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > int ffa_handle_notification_set(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM > +void ffa_raise_rx_buffer_full(struct domain *d); > +#else > +static inline void ffa_raise_rx_buffer_full(struct domain *d) > +{ > +} > +#endif > + > void ffa_handle_msg_send_direct_req(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t > fid); > int32_t ffa_handle_msg_send2(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > -- > 2.47.1 >
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |